Crisis and Coercive Pleas
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Joint Crisis Plans reduce coercive treatment
Methods Design: Single blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: Eight community mental health teams in southern England. Participants: 160 people with psychotic or bipolar disorder who had had a hospital admission within the previous two years. Intervention: The joint crisis plan was formulated by the patient, care coordinator, psychiatrist, and project worker and contained contact informati...
متن کاملPsychiatric advance directives and reduction of coercive crisis interventions.
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric advance directives are intended to enable self-determined treatment for patients who lose decisional capacity, and thus reduce the need for coercive interventions such as police transport, involuntary commitment, seclusion and restraints, and involuntary medications during mental health crises; whether PADs can help prevent the use of these interventions in practice is u...
متن کاملEconomic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date...
متن کاملPleas without Bargaining: Guilty Pleas in the Felony Courts of Illinois, Michigan and Pennsylvania
outlines of two very different conceptions of the guilty plea process in answering the question: What makes the plea system work? While most observers agree some form of trial penalty exists to encourage pleas (i.e., a more severe sentence will be given to defendants who are convicted after trial), they differ over how pleas are put together. These differences form the basis for two competing m...
متن کاملNegotiating about charges and pleas – balancing interests and justice
There is a worldwide movement towards alternatives to judicial decision-making for legal disputes. In the domain of criminal sentencing, in Western countries more than 95% of cases are guilty pleas, with many being decided by negotiations over charges and pleas, rather than a decision being made after a judge or jury has heard all relevant evidence in a trial. Because decisions are being made, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3632052